A bill that backers said would have bolstered education in Indigenous languages was among the casualties of Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham’s veto pocket. The deadline for the governor to act on bills was ...

In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court on Tuesday (April 8) set time limits for the decisions by the Governors under ...

A failure to meet these timetables would give an aggrieved state the right to approach the high court or the Supreme Court, ...

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that governors cannot indefinitely delay giving assent to bills passed by state ...

The apex court curbed the governor’s legislative power, set strict timelines for approval for bills and berated Tamil Nadu ...

Michelle Lujan Grisham’s veto pocket. The deadline for the governor to act on bills was Friday. The day came and went with 17 bills that had passed the House and Senate going unsigned.

The Supreme Court of India has mandated that the President must decide within three months on bills referred by state ...

The court clarified that the governor cannot withhold assent or apply the concepts of an absolute veto or a pocket veto. It ruled that the governor is required to choose one of three actions ...

The State Of Tamil Nadu vs The Governor of Tamilnadu and Anr. judgment has brought greater clarity to the constitutional ...

The Supreme Court of India ruled that the Governor must choose to either give assent to bills, withhold assent, or reserve ...