VIGICANCER: Understanding Real-World Childhood Cancer Clinical Outcomes in Colombia to Inform Cancer Control Policy A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ...

Meta-analysis is an objective examination of published data from many studies of the same research topic identified through a literature search. Through the use of rigorous statistical methods, it can ...

Questionable value of attribution when interpreting adverse event data: A joint evaluation by North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) and American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) ...

A new network meta-analysis has compared oral, intramuscular, and sublingual vitamin B12 supplementation, finding intramuscular delivery ranked highest in boosting levels, though differences were not ...

The benefit of beta-blockers after myocardial infarction in patients with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis at the individual-patient level ...

Meta-analyses (MAs) have long been considered the “gold standard” of evidence-based practice. They are often listed at the top of evidence hierarchies and cited as the final word on whether an ...

Sometimes, psychological studies on the same topic show different results. To know what the evidence looks like when the data from all studies on a topic are combined, psychologists often conduct ...

Acupuncture for breast cancer CINV is being systematically compared. Read more about this upcoming evidence review.

Introduction Mindfulness-based interventions are widely used, yet concerns about potential negative effects—particularly those related to mindfulness meditation practice—have gained increasing ...